Authors must disclose the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process by adding a statement at the end of their manuscript in the core manuscript file before the References list. The statement should be placed in a new section entitled ‘Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process’.
Statement: During the preparation of this work, the author (s) used [NAME TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author (s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.
This declaration does not apply to the use of basic tools for checking grammar, spelling, references, etc. If there is nothing to disclose, there is no need to add a statement.
Reporting on Sex and Gender in Research
For research involving humans and animals, we recommend that authors consider sex and gender factors in their papers when applicable, ensuring they use the terms "sex" and "gender" clearly to avoid any confusion. "Sex" refers to the biological traits associated with physical and physiological characteristics in humans and animals, while "gender" pertains to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, and identities of women, men, and gender-diverse individuals, influenced by historical and cultural contexts that differ across societies and change over time. Gender shapes how people view themselves and others, how they act and interact, and how power is distributed in society. It is crucial to understand that gender is not limited to a binary (female/male) system; instead, there is a broad spectrum of gender identities and expressions. For additional guidance, authors may find the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines useful.
Using Inclusive Language in Research
Inclusive language in scientific research ensures respect for diversity, sensitivity to differences, and equal opportunities for all. It is important to avoid assumptions about readers’ beliefs or values and to refrain from language that implies superiority based on factors such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability, or health status. Research writing should be free from bias, stereotypes, and cultural assumptions. Where possible, gender-neutral language should be used, for example, using plural nouns such as “clinicians” or “patients/clients” instead of gendered pronouns like “he” or “she.” References to personal attributes should only be included when relevant to the research. In technical terminology, it is recommended to replace terms such as “master” and “slave” with “primary” and “secondary,” and “blacklist” and “whitelist” with “blocklist” and “allowlist” to ensure neutral and inclusive language. While these guidelines provide general recommendations, they are not exhaustive or prescriptive but serve as a foundation for fostering inclusive and respectful scientific communication.
Preprints
Science Park Publisher accepts articles that have been previously published as preprints, provided they undergo significant revisions and improvements. These articles will be subject to a thorough peer review process to ensure they meet our publication standards before being officially published.
Authorship
Authorship Criteria
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. This includes those who have participated in drafting or critically revising the manuscript. It is important to establish clear authorship criteria early in the research process and ensure that all co-authors agree on their inclusion.
Acknowledging Contributions
Individuals who contributed to the research but do not meet the authorship criteria should be recognized in the acknowledgments section. For transparency, authors are encouraged to submit an author statement file detailing each contributor’s specific role using the relevant CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) classifications, which include Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing Original Draft, and Writing, Review & Editing. Authorship statements should list each author’s name followed by their corresponding CRediT role(s). Additional details and examples are available.
Author contributions
For transparency, we require corresponding authors to provide co-author contributions to the manuscript using the relevant CRediT roles. The CRediT taxonomy includes 14 different roles describing each contributor’s specific contribution to the scholarly output.
The roles are Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Roles/Writing - original draft; and Writing - review & editing. Note that not all roles may apply to every manuscript, and authors may have contributed through multiple roles.
Order of Authors
The order of authors should reflect the relative contributions of everyone to the research. This sequence should be agreed upon by all co-authors before submission. The corresponding author must be clearly designated.
Changes to Authorship
Authors should carefully review the authorship list and order before submitting their manuscript and provide the final approved list at the time of the original submission. Any changes to authorship—including additions, removals, or rearrangements must be formally requested before acceptance and must be approved by the journal editor.
To request a change in authorship, the corresponding author must submit:
1. A clear justification for the change.
2. Written confirmation from all co-authors, including consent from any author being added or removed.
Changes to authorship after acceptance will only be considered in exceptional circumstances. During the review of such a request, publication will be put on hold. If the manuscript has already been published, approved changes will be reflected in a corrigendum.
If you want to add a co-author, please send an email request to the journal office. A form will be sent to you, which must be completed and returned for the editor’s consideration.
Role of the funding source
You are asked to specify the organization(s) that funded the research and/or the preparation of the article, and to briefly describe their role, if any, in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, as well as in writing the report and deciding to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no involvement, it is recommended to mention this.
Referees
Please submit the names and institutional (preferred) or private e-mail addresses of several potential referees. Please provide a list of at least three referees. Note that the Editor retains the sole right to decide whether or not the suggested reviewers are used.
Open Access
Science Park publisher Services
"Science Park Publisher provides an open-access platform for multidisciplinary research across various fields. It also hosts events and conferences, while offering several interactive modules, webinars, and downloadable resources to assist you with the writing process. These free resources are available to help you enhance your submission and smoothly guide you through the publication process.
Authors who believe their English language manuscript might need editing to correct potential grammatical or spelling mistakes and to ensure it adheres to proper scientific English can consider using the English Language Editing service available through the Science Park Paid Services link.
Submission
Our online submission platform will take you through each step of the process, allowing you to input your article details and upload your files and then build your PDF, which is used during the peer-review process. For the final publication, editable formats such as Word. All communication, including decisions from the Editor and revision requests, will be sent via email.
The author must inform the editor of manuscripts submitted, soon to be submitted, or in press at other journals that have a bearing on the manuscript being submitted. Duplicate submission is not permitted and will result in rejection. Ethical guidelines issued by
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) are followed.
Suggesting Reviewers
When suggesting reviewers, please provide the full names and institutional email addresses of potential candidates. Avoid recommending individuals who are your colleagues or who have collaborated or co-authored with you within the past three years. Editors will not consider reviewers with potential conflicts of interest. To ensure a comprehensive and unbiased evaluation of your work, as well as scientific accuracy, please propose a diverse group of reviewers from different countries or regions than your author group. Additionally, consider diversity in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, career stage, and other factors. Do not suggest members of the journal’s editorial team, as they are already known to the journal.
Note: The editor has the discretion to decide whether or not to invite the reviewers you have suggested.
3. Manuscript Submission Requirements
a. File Format & Submission
- Submit via Science Park Publisher Website.
- Acceptable formats: Microsoft Word (.doc/.docx).
- Include the following files:
- Title Page(unblinded) with author details
- Main Manuscript (blinded) for anonymous peer review
- Highlights are 3–5 bullet points (≤85 characters each) summarizing your paper’s main findings, novel contributions, and methods in clear, non-technical language to boost discoverability. Avoid jargon, acronyms, and duplication from the abstract.
b. Title Page
Include the following:
- Full article title
- Full names of all authors with institutional affiliations
- ORCID iDs (optional but encouraged)
- Email address of corresponding author
- Short biographical note (50–70 words per author)
- Funding acknowledgment
- Conflict of interest statement
4. Manuscript Structure & Formatting
a. General Formatting
- Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt
- Line spacing: Double
- Margins: 1 inch on all sides
- Page numbers: Top right on all pages
- Use only three heading levels (e.g., Level 1 bold, Level 2 italics)
- Paragraphs: Indent first line; do not add extra space between paragraphs
- Do not use footnotes for citations; use sparingly for clarification only
b. Manuscript Sections (in order)
1. Title Page (submitted separately)
2. Abstract (max. 250 words)
3. 3–6 Keywords
4. Main Text (Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Analysis, Discussion, Conclusion)
5. Acknowledgments & Funding--*
6. Conflict of Interest Statement
7. Declaration of AI Assistance (if applicable)
8. Author Contributions (CRediT taxonomy)
9. References (APA)
10. Appendices (if applicable)
5. Referencing Style (APA)
All in-text citations and references must follow APA Style. Here are key guidelines:
a. In-text Citations
- Single author: (Ahmed, 2021)
- Two authors: (Smith & Lee, 2019)
- Three or more: (Jones et al., 2020)
b. Reference List
- Alphabetized by author’s last name
- Double-spaced with hanging indent
- Include DOIs or URLs when available
6. Figures, Tables & Linguistic Examples
a. Figures
- Insert in-text where they should appear
- Label sequentially (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.)
- Provide captions below each figure
- Format: PNG, JPEG, or TIFF (min. 300 dpi)
b. Tables
- Insert in-text with clear numbering (Table 1, Table 2…)
- Caption placed above each table
- Use Word’s table function—not tabs
c. Linguistic Data
- Use Leipzig Glossing Rules where applicable
- Present glossed examples in numbered format or tables
Maintain consistency in transcription and font (e.g., use IPA where needed)
7. Declaration of AI Assistance
Authors must declare any use of generative AI tools in the writing process.
“This manuscript involved the use of (Tool name, version) for [e.g., grammar and syntax refinement]. The authors independently verified and edited all AI-assisted content and assume complete responsibility for the submitted and published material. AI tools cannot be credited as authors. Substantive content or analysis must be the work of the listed authors.”
8. Authorship & Contributions
Use the CRediT taxonomy to specify each author's role in the research and writing process. For example:
- Conceptualization: A. Author
- Writing – original draft: A. Author
- Writing – review & editing: B. Author
- Data curation: C. Author
9. Ethics & Originality
- Submissions must be original and not under review elsewhere.
- If based on prior presentations, theses, or preprints, this must be disclosed.
- All cited work must be properly acknowledged.
- Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, will result in immediate rejection.
- Studies involving human subjects must state ethics approval and consent (if applicable).
10. Peer Review Process
- The journal operates a single blind peer reviewsystem.
- Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two subject experts.
- Authors may suggest not at least3 reviewers (institutional emails required).
- Typical review period: 2-3 weeks
- Upon revision, authors must submit a point-by-point response to reviewers’ comments
Peer review
- Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final. Editors are not involved in decisions about papers that they have written themselves or have been written by family members or colleagues, or which relate to products or services in which the Editor has an interest.
11. Copyright, Licensing & Open Access
- Authors retain copyright
- All articles are published open access
- A DOI will be assigned to each accepted article
Submission checklist Add a hyper link to the attached file
After Acceptance
To ensure a fast publication process of the article, we kindly ask authors to provide us with their proof corrections within two days. Corresponding authors will receive an e-mail with a link to our proofing system, allowing annotation and correction of proofs. The environment is similar to MS Word: in addition to editing text, you can also comment on figures/tables and answer questions from the Copy Editor.
If preferred, you can still choose to annotate and upload your edits on the PDF version. All instructions for proofing will be given in the e-mail we send to authors
We will do everything possible to get your article published quickly and accurately. Please use this proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness, and correctness of the text, tables, and figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only be considered at this stage with permission from the Editor. It is important to ensure that all corrections are sent back to us in one communication. Please check carefully before replying, as the inclusion of any subsequent corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely your responsibility.
